Cadborosaurus Ahoy!

[Giratina93]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43801173/ns ... om/toolbar

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm certain you are all aware of the Lock Ness Monster. Well, here in the Pacific Northwest, there is said to live a relative of Nessie called Caddy, or Cadborosaurus. This creature has been sighted for many, many years, but now, we have actual, undeniable fotage of the creature! SUCK IT, MAINSTREAM PALEONTOLOGISTS!!!

Anyways, This is simply too good of a chance to miss out on. If anyone needs me, I'll be swimming with the fishes to find this creature...

[Godzilla Forever]

I don't know what to think. I mean, I want to believe that it is a prehistoric remnant that lives in our world, but I dunno. It really could be anything. This video certainly adds some credibility to this "Caddy".

[TyrannoTitan]

Awesome? Yes. Undeniable? Far from it.

[Hopeflower]

Pic at the top of the article looks more like close-up blurry pic of a dead branch than an animal. Can't access the footage right now, will look at it later. I believe there are creatures out there we have minimal or no knowledge of - but I don't know if this is one of them or another hoax.

[Godzilla Forever]

@ HF: it appears to have gills at one point in the vid, so maybe it is a giant Salamander of some kind or something along those lines.

[The Kingpin]

first thought on the name: chocolate. Though I dunno if you guys get that brand in the US...

[Hopeflower]

F*cking Cadbury's. *highfive* XD

[Galaxia]

From the picture I can see how it might get your hopes up but really all I see is a bunch of shapes that look a bit like mostly submerged driftwood

I can see why you could think it's a monster,people who claim to see monsters usually do because they want to see it and thus their imagination will make almost anything that looks vaguely like said monster look just like the monster.Being Scottish I always believed there was a monster in Loch Ness,and in a way I still have a lingering hope there is maybe because I grew up thinking there was and never accepted the facts that show the notion to be a bit bogus

[TyrantTR]

Yeah I'm going to go ahead and doubt this. Seems like it could be a text book case of miss-identification. I've seen far more convincing footage proven to not be what it seams. I don't know why this should be any different, just because the guys from the deadliest catch supposedly saw it?

I'm more a skeptic now then I used to be I spose, but cryptozoology has turned into such a stupid study. It was supposed to be about undiscovered animals, but now all anyone cares about is finding dinosaurs and unicorns, and then they wonder why no one takes them seriously.